Optimax 200 vs. EFI 200 Optimax 200 vs. EFI 200
Bass Fishing Home PageTM    Boats and Motors  
Boating Equip.
Guides
Tackle Shops
Fishing Acc.
Lodging


7-11-2013

Fishing Reports
BFHP Articles
Fishing News
Tournaments
Fishing Tactics
Places to Fish
Rods/Reels
Electronics
Boats/Motors
Boat Ramp Stories
Trailers/Towing
Props
Other Topics
Other Fishing Topics
Swap/Sell
Swap/Sell (no boats)
Props 4 Sale

Boats 4 Sale
Saltwater Fishing
Non-Fishing
Striped Bass
Lure Making
More Politics
Co-Anglers


Boats and Motors

    Optimax 200 vs. EFI 200
from Tom Wilkinson (208.133.52.229)  
1/18/1999 9:49:00 AM

Rated:

 I am ordering a new Ranger and need to power it with a 200. The Optimax cost about $1400.00 more than the EFI but gets better fuel economy, but has more moving parts(compressor) and the cost of extended warranty is more. Also the Mercury home page says: "Complies with EPA regulations TO the year 2006". I thought that the Optimax was compliant past 2006. The 200 EFI uses more fuel but weighs 100 pounds less and is simpler in design, so I was leaning toward the EFI. I am planning on keeping this boat for a while, can anyone convince me I should get the Optimax. Tom W.


Rate this message:
1 Star

2 Star

3 Star

4 Star

5 Star

   Optimax 200 vs. EFI 200 from Jim Bailey (208.245.25.55)  1/18/1999 3:35:00 PM
 Tom hope I don't get killed here but I ordered a 200 Optimax on a new 99 Triton...A friend of mine who had a 98 Ranger 518 with a 200 efi came by the day I got my boat and had a fit. He went out two days later and ordered a new 99 Ranger with the 200 Optimax on it. The motor is sweet. Don't worry about the extra 100 lbs. It will tote the bacon. P.S. I haven't had ANY TROUBLE with the motor ( 94 hours )
   EFI vs Opti from Mike Whitten (207.15.163.107)  1/18/1999 5:01:00 PM
 Tom, I've run both and have the Optimax on my Pantera III. You are correct, it is a different motor than the EFI, but it is sweet. The fuel and oil economy is great! You may find that it takes one pitch smaller prop than the EFI, and I personally think it is 1-2 mph slower than the EFI. But, overall, I think it is a fine choice. Mike Whitten/Memphis
   Yr 2006 compliance from gates (134.163.253.9)  1/19/1999 11:52:00 AM
 Referring to your comment about being EPA compliant to the year 2006... Think I read somewhere that beginning that year, manufactures will not be able to build 2 stroke engines.?? The current 2 strokes (Opti Max, Fitch) meet the 2002 standards. I'm sure someone out there is more familiar with the specifics of the law.

Name:

Password:

Can't remember your password? Click here!
State:
Email Address:

Users with subscriptions can attach pictures to their comments by using the form at http://www.wmi.org/newboard/upload_pictures/"

Subject:

Comments:


 

Advertising/Sponsor Information
Subscriptions
Register to post messages and reports

7-11-2013

Subscribers don't receive these ads


Fishing Reports
BFHP Articles
Fishing News
Upcoming Events
Rally Page
BFHP Surveys
Fishing Tactics
Places to Fish
Rods/Reels
Electronics
Other Topics
Product Evaluations

Boats/Motors
Boat Ramp Stories
Trailers & Towing
Boats For Sale
Tournament Tactics
Striped Bass

Swap/Sell
Clubs 
Fly Fishing
Hunting
Props
Fish4
Saltwater Fishing
Non-Fishing 2
Political Hook
Tall Tales, Fiction & Legend
Complete Listing of Boards
Copyright © WMI, Inc. 1995-2014. All rights reserved.
This message board created and maintained by: WebMasters International, Inc. (WMI) address mail to wmi@wmi.org

WMI disclaimer
Privacy Statement

Google